Английский язык профессионального общения для аспирантов
Покупка
Новинка
Основная коллекция
Тематика:
Английский язык
Издательство:
РГЭУ (РИНХ)
Год издания: 2018
Кол-во страниц: 77
Дополнительно
Вид издания:
Учебное пособие
Уровень образования:
ВО - Бакалавриат
ISBN: 978-5-7972-2515-7
Артикул: 859558.01.99
Данное учебное пособие включает практические материалы для проведения занятий по дисциплине «Английский язык профессионального общения» на продвинутом уровне и ориентировано на аспирантов направления «Экономика». Цель пособия - актуализировать знания норм, стереотипов и правил речевого поведения, принятых у представптедей научного международного сообщества, а также сформировать умения и навыки устного и письменного предъявления информации по теме научного исследования. Учебное пособие построено на модульном принципе обучения и состоит из двух модулей, в которых описываются особенности научного стиля речи и научно-профессиональной коммуникации на английском языке. Предложенные аутентичные материалы и лексико-грамматические задания дают возможность аспирантам овдадеть различными речевыми стратегиями и тактиками устного и письменного предъявления информации; понимать общее содержание сложных научно-профессиональных текстов на абстрактные и конкретные темы. Рекомендуется для студентов аспирантуры и магистратуры, изучающих английский язык профессионального общения по направлению «Экономика».
Тематика:
ББК:
УДК:
ОКСО:
- ВО - Бакалавриат
- 38.03.01: Экономика
- ВО - Магистратура
- 38.04.01: Экономика
- Аспирантура
- 38.06.01: Экономика
ГРНТИ:
Скопировать запись
Фрагмент текстового слоя документа размещен для индексирующих роботов
МИНИСТЕРСТВО НАУКИ И ВЫСШЕГО ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ РОСТОВСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ (РИНХ) Васичкина О.Н., Самарская С.В. АНГЛИЙСКИЙ ЯЗЫК ПРОФЕССИОНАЛЬНОГО ОБЩЕНИЯ ДЛЯ АСПИРАНТОВ Учебное пособие Ростов-на-Дону Издательско-полиграфический комплекс РГЭУ (РИНХ) 2018
УДК 811.111 (075) ББК 81.2Англ В 19 Васичкина, О.Н. В 19 Английский язык профессионального общения для аспирантов : учеб. пособие / О.Н. Васичкина, С.В. Самарская. – Ростов н/Д: Издательскополиграфический комплекс РГЭУ (РИНХ), 2018. – 77 с. ISBN 978-5-7972-2515-7 Данное учебное пособие включает практические материалы для проведения занятий по дисциплине «Английский язык профессионального общения» на продвинутом уровне и ориентировано на аспирантов направления «Экономика». Цель пособия – актуализировать знания норм, стереотипов и правил речевого поведения, принятых у представителей научного международного сообщества, а также сформировать умения и навыки устного и письменного предъявления информации по теме научного исследования. Учебное пособие построено на модульном принципе обучения и состоит из двух модулей, в которых описываются особенности научного стиля речи и научно-профессиональной коммуникации на английском языке. Предложенные аутентичные материалы и лексико-грамматические задания дают возможность аспирантам овладеть различными речевыми стратегиями и тактиками устного и письменного предъявления информации; понимать общее содержание сложных научно-профессиональных текстов на абстрактные и конкретные темы. Рекомендуется для студентов аспирантуры и магистратуры, изучающих английский язык профессионального общения по направлению «Экономика». УДК 811.111 (075) ББК 81.2Англ Рецензенты: Гринченко Л.В., доцент кафедры теории и практики английского языка ИФЖиМКК ЮФУ Барабанова И.Г., к.ф.н., доцент кафедры лингвистики и журналистики РГЭУ (РИНХ) Утверждено в качестве учебного пособия редакционно-издательским советом Ростовского государственного экономического университета (РИНХ). ISBN 978-5-7972-2515-7 Ростовский государственный экономический университет (РИНХ), 2018 Васичкина, О.Н., Самарская С.В., 2018
INTRODUCTION Nowadays it is impossible to imagine our life without science and technology. Much attention is paid to scientific development at the level of higher education. The English language proved to be the main means of communication in the field of research, development and science. That is why graduate and postgraduate students have to understand the bulk of information that is provided in English. This textbook can be regarded a guide to reading scientific texts in various sciences, particularly in Economics. The textbook consists of 2 modules: MODULE I. Special features of the scientific style of English language. Unit I. Scientific style of speech Unit II. Stylistic features of scientific speech Unit III. Lexical features of scientific speech Unit IV. Grammar features of scientific speech Unit V. Comparison of scientific (formal) style with informal MODULE II. Writing for scientific purposes. Unit I. Rendering an article Unit II. Writing a summary Unit III. Writing a research report Unit IV. Defending a thesis Each module contains valuable information for graduates and postgraduates about communicative skills needed in the field of presenting their research as well as tasks for development of skills of the thesis writing and tasks providing reading comprehension, vocabulary work with scientific and professional articles. The texts are selected in the way as to make all graduates and postgraduates get interested in the topics discussed, irrespective of their specialty and qualification. These recommendations will be quite useful in preparatory course for passing postgraduate exam in English and for graduates and postgraduates all success possible in their researches, theses and scientific careers.
MODULE I SPECIAL FEATURES OF THE SCIENTIFIC STYLE OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE UNIT I SCIENTIFIC STYLE OF SPEECH Before proceeding to the consideration of the features of scientific and business styles of speech, first of all, it is advisable to turn to the definition of the concept of "style". There are several main interpretations of this term. 1. Style as a generally accepted manner, the norm of speech, a typified way of its implementation. 2. Style as an individual way of speech expression. In this regard, we talk about the style of a particular person, a scientist, a writer. 3. Functional style is a historically developed, socially conscious speech variety, which has a specific character, formed as a result of the implementation of special principles of selection and combination of language means. As a rule, it corresponds to a particular socially significant sphere of communication and activity, correlating with a certain form of consciousness. Scientific style is used in the sphere of science, that is, the sphere of human activity, whose function is to develop and theoretically comprehend objective knowledge about reality. As a way of mastering reality, science is characterized by the desire for the most generalized, objective, impersonal knowledge. Characteristic features of the scientific style The scientific style has a number of common features, which are manifested regardless of the nature of certain Sciences (natural, exact, humanitarian) and differences between the genres of expression: monograph, scientific article, abstracts of an article, summary of an article, report, textbook, etc.). It makes it possible to talk about the specific features of the style as a whole. At the same time, it is quite natural that, for example, texts on Physics, chemistry and mathematics differ markedly in nature from those on Philology, Economics or History. Science seeks to reveal the objective nature of the subject, to show what it is outside and regardless of the person, his feelings and emotions, desires. Therefore, the style-forming beginning of all scientific works is the logical sequence of presentation; they are not oriented on the emotion
al and sensual perception, but, first of all, on the logical one, the desire for maximum objectivity. Today logical rigor, objectivity, consistency and accuracy of presentation, standardization, uniformity, a kind of clichés of means of expression are considered to be the generally accepted characteristics of the scientific style. All researchers of scientific style show the unity of opinion that scientific style is characterized by logical sequence of the statement, the ordered system of communications between parts of the statement, aspiration of authors to accuracy, conciseness, unambiguity at preservation of saturation of the content. Let us clarify what is behind these terms. Logic is the existence of semantic links between consecutive units. The sequence has only such a text, in which they follow from each other, they are consistent, the text is divided into separate semantic segments, reflecting the movement of thought from the particular to the General or from the General to the particular. Clarity, as the quality of scientific speech, implies clarity, accessibility. In terms of accessibility, scientific, educational and non-academic texts differ in material and in the way in which they are presented in the language. Precision of scientific language refers to the unambiguity of understanding, the lack of differences between the signified concept and its definition. Therefore, in scientific texts, as a rule, there are no figurative, expressive means; words are used mainly in direct meaning, a large frequency of using them also contributes to the uniqueness of the text. Strict requirements for the accuracy required for a scientific text, impose restrictions of using a figurative language: metaphors, epithets, comparisons, etc. Sometimes these tools can penetrate into scientific work, as scientific style is committed not only to precision, but also to the credibility of evidence. Sometimes figurative means are necessary for the realization of the requirement of clarity, plainness of narration. Emotionality in a scientific style, like expressiveness, requires an objective, "intellectual" presentation of scientific data; it is expressed differently than in other styles. The perception of a scientific work can cause certain feelings of a reader, but not as a response to the emotionality of the author, but as a result of the awareness of scientific fact. However scientific discovery affects regardless of the method of its transmission, the author of the scientific work does not always abandon the emotional and evaluative attitude to the events and facts presented. The desire for limited
use of the author's "I" is not a tribute to etiquette but the manifestation of abstract-generalized style features of scientific speech, reflecting the scientific form of thinking. Summarizing the above-mentioned, the specific features of the scientific style can be represented as the following scheme (see fig. 1). SPECIFIC FEATURES OF SCIENTIFIC STYLE General (primary) Private (secondary, derivatives) Abstractness Generality Emphasized logic Terminology Accuracy Objectivity Strictness Non-resoluteness Uniqueness Standardness Valuation Clarity Briefness Figure1. Specific features of the scientific style Tasks and exercises 1. Read and translate the texts and decide what type of genres they belong (a scientific article, an abstract of an article, a summary of an article, a report). Prove you choice. A.WHAT IS ECONOMICS? Human beings have lots of wants. Our striving to improve our material well-being, to «make a living», is the concern of economics. More specifically, economics is the study of the behavior of human beings in producing, distributing and consuming material goods and services. In order to produce anything, we need resources, or factors of production – land, labor, and capital (buildings and machinery). Factors of production are used to produce final goods and services which satisfy our material wants. And this is done through the organizational mechanism which we call the economic system or economy. Unfortunately, the quantity of available resources is limited. We cannot produce everything we want in the quantities we desire. Resources are scarce relative to our desires. Scarcity is a basic fact of economic life. So, economics is concerned with the efficient use of scarce resources in the production of goods and services to satisfy material wants and the economy means a system for the management, use and control of the money, goods and other resources of a country, community or household.
Understanding how various economies work is the basic purpose of studying economics. We want to know how an economy is organized, how it behaves, and how successfully it achieves its basic objectives. What do economists do? They formulate economic principles which are useful in setting policies designed to solve economic problems. The economists gather facts which are relevant to a particular problem or specific segment of the economy. This task is sometimes called descriptive or empirical economics. The generalizations stated by economists are called «principles», «theories», «laws», or «models». Principles and theories – the end result of economic analysis – bring order and meaning to a number of facts by tying these facts together, putting them in correct relationship to one another, generalizing upon them. The task of economic theory or «economic analysis» is the derivation of these principles. Economic principles are particularly valuable in formulating economic policy designed to solve problems and control undesirable events. B. THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF TRADE The article is headlined “The Political Economy of Trade: A Preliminary View”. It is from the book International Economics. The extract addresses the problem of two ways on looking at trade policy. The first one: what should the government do to provide optimal trade policy? And the second: what are governments likely to do in practice? The author points out that the income distribution effects of trade are important to the first way of looking at the issue and are crucial to the second. Then a discussion how to make trade policy optimal follows. The author writes that in homogeneous economy free international trade serves the government's objective. But when people are not exactly alike the government's problem is less well defined. It must somehow weigh one person's gain against another person's loss. The author states that some groups need special treatment because they are already relatively poor. So the question is raised: should trade be allowed only if it doesn't hurt lower-income people? The author admits that in spite of the real importance of income distribution, most economists are in favor of free trade. He says about three main reasons why economists do not generally stress the income distribution effects of trade: 1. Income distribution effects are not specific to international trade. 2. All modern industrial countries provide some sort of "safety net" of income support that can compensate the losses of groups hurt by trade.
3. Those who stand to lose from increased trade are typically better organized than those who stand to gain. So the traditional role of economists is to strongly support free trade, pointing to the overall gains. The author comes to the conclusion that it is more important to stress the potential gains from trade than the possible losses to some groups in a country. C. PURPOSES OF ACCOUNTING This abstract is devoted to the definition of the accounting system purposes. It is said that the accounting system is the most credible, quantitative information system, which can be found in almost every organization. The main four purposes of providing such information are defined in this abstract: three of them are internal purposes and the fourth is external one. The first and the second purposes are designed for routine reporting to managers for cost planning and on profitability of business performing. It is underlined that this information is necessary for making decisions on resource allocation and on pricing. The third purpose is non-routine one. It is providing information for strategic and tactical decisions on matters such as formulating overall policies. The fourth purpose is defined as external reporting through financial statements to investors, government and others about income and inventory costs. Also in this abstract it is stressed that different ways of reporting the data are required for each purpose and accountants should combine these data to answer the questions of the broadest set of users. D. The gig economy is actually smaller than it used to be, Labor Department says The so-called gig economy is actually slightly smaller than it used to be, according to a new Labor Department report released Thursday that chronicles the jobs market in the age of Uber. In May 2017, the Labor Department counted 5.9 million people , or 3.8% of workers, in what it calls contingent jobs, which are those that the workers don‟t expect to last or that workers call temporary. In 2005, the last time the government looked into the issue; there were 4.1% of workers who classified themselves this way. “Taken at face value, the results indicate that the role of nontraditional work arrangements in the U.S. economy has remained largely unchanged during the past 20 years, even as excitement and media cover