How to write a research article in English. Theory and practice = Как написать исследовательскую статью на английском языке. Теория и практика
Покупка
Издательство:
ФЛИНТА
Под ред.:
Коннолли Дэвид
Год издания: 2022
Кол-во страниц: 108
Дополнительно
Вид издания:
Учебное пособие
Уровень образования:
ВО - Магистратура
ISBN: 978-5-9765-4647-9
Артикул: 799540.01.99
Значительная часть зарубежных журналов и все больше российских изданий требуют, чтобы структура исследовательских статей соответствовала структуре IMRAD, т.е. чтобы статья содержала введение (возможно, с включением обзора литературы), описание методов исследования, анализ результатов исследования и их обсуждение. Каждый из перечисленных элементов исследовательской статьи подразумевает определенное содержание, структуру и использование определенного языка. Овладение ими позволяет ускорить и упростить работу над статьей. В пособии мы рассматриваем требования к содержанию и структуре отдельных элементов исследовательской статьи на английском языке. Мы анализируем язык, используемый для осуществления целей, диктуемых содержательными и структурными особенностями элементов статьи. Теоретическая информация изложена доступно и сопровождается примерами из исследовательских статей и практическими заданиями с ответами. Пособие может использоваться для самостоятельной работы.
Скопировать запись
Фрагмент текстового слоя документа размещен для индексирующих роботов
С.В. Боголепова HOW TO WRITE A RESEARCH ARTICLE IN ENGLISH Theory and practice КАК НАПИСАТЬ ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬСКУЮ СТАТЬЮ НА АНГЛИЙСКОМ ЯЗЫКЕ Теория и практика Учебное пособие Москва Издательство «ФЛИНТА» 2022
УДК 811.111(075.8) ББК 81.432.1я73 Б74 Ре це нзе нты: Н.А. Гунина — канд. филол. наук, доцент, зав. кафедрой «Иностранные языки и профессиональная коммуникация» ФГБОУ ВО «Тамбовский государственный технический университет»; Е.В. Шадрова — канд. пед. наук, доцент кафедры английского языка ФГБОУ ВО «Вологодский государственный университет» Авто р Боголепова Светлана Викторовна — канд. филол. наук, доцент Школы иностранных языков Национального исследовательского университета «Высшая школа экономики», автор более 40 статей в российских и международных рецензируемых журналах Редактор Дэвид Коннолли — консультант и редактор Центра академического письма Национального исследовательского университета «Высшая школа экономики», автор статей в международных рецензируемых журналах и пособий по академическому письму Б74 Боголепова С.В. How to write a research article in English. Theory and practice. = Как написать исследовательскую статью на английском языке. Теория и практика : учебное пособие / С.В. Боголепова ; под ред. Д. Коннолли. — Москва : ФЛИНТА, 2022. — 108 с. — ISBN 978-5-9765-4647-9. — Текст : электронный. Значительная часть зарубежных журналов и все больше российских изданий требуют, чтобы структура исследовательских статей соответствовала структуре IMRAD, т.е. чтобы статья содержала введение (возможно, с включением обзора литературы), описание методов исследования, анализ результатов исследования и их обсуждение. Каждый из перечисленных элементов исследовательской статьи подразумевает определенное содержание, структуру и использование определенного языка. Овладение ими позволяет ускорить и упростить работу над статьей. В пособии мы рассматриваем требования к содержанию и структуре отдельных элементов исследовательской статьи на английском языке. Мы анализируем язык, используемый для осуществления целей, диктуемых содержательными и структурными особенностями элементов статьи. Теоретическая информация изложена доступно и сопровождается примерами из исследовательских статей и практическими заданиями с ответами. Пособие может использоваться для самостоятельной работы. УДК 811.111(075.8) ББК 81.432.1я73 ISBN 978-5-9765-4647-9 © Боголепова С.В., 2022 © Издательство «ФЛИНТА», 2022
Contents Preface ...............................................................................................................4 Academic English .............................................................................................6 Academic Vocabulary .....................................................................................11 Literature Review ............................................................................................15 Materials and Methods ....................................................................................32 Results .............................................................................................................49 Discussion .......................................................................................................58 Introduction and Conclusion ...........................................................................75 Abstract and Title ............................................................................................89 Closing Remarks ...........................................................................................103 Resources ......................................................................................................105 Appendix .......................................................................................................106
PREFACE This book is for researchers planning to write research articles in English. It will make you aware of what is expected for each part of a research article in terms of content, structure and language. Through exposure to authentic texts, you will form an understanding of the features of English academic writing. You will use the tips and language to create your own arguments, paragraphs and texts. The book is structured as follows. The fi rst two chapters, “Academic English” and “Academic Vocabulary”, raise the readers’ awareness of the specifi c features of academic writing in English. The chapters after these focus on each section of a research article: introduction, literature review, methods, results, discussion, and abstract. In each of these chapters there are two parts: theory and practice. Theory explains what is expected of a particular section in terms of structure, content, and language. Examples and schematic representations are provided. Extracts from research articles published in peer-reviewed journals illustrate the paragraph structure and linguistic expectations. Practice starts with text analysis and drills. Then, tasks in which the learner is asked to come up with elements of their own article can be found. The learner is provided with functional phrases, which allow them to construct their own texts. These structures help writers to communicate their ideas accurately, concisely and clearly. Every chapter has a linguistic focus related to the purpose of the relevant section of an article. For example, when describing the research methods, researchers are more likely to use the passive voice as the description centres on the object the research, the participants and the procedures, but not on the researchers themselves. Therefore, the use of passive structures is practised in the chapter, and the user of the book learns to effectively combine passive and active structures in their writing. For the “Literature
Review” chapter reporting verbs and paraphrasing are the focus; hedging and tentative language are introduced in the “Discussion”. Academic vocabulary is an integral part of English for Research Publication Purposes (ERPP). In each chapter you will practice the use of such vocabulary in authentic contexts. However, this may not be enough. Write out the vocabulary units you want to remember and try using them in your own writing. The circulation of core academic vocabulary throughout the book will aid its memorisation. Use the resources you can access via the provided links and go beyond the book to learn more about the meaning and the use of academic vocabulary and structures.
ACADEMIC ENGLISH Academic English is a broad notion. It incorporates the language that is used by students from different disciplines when they write essays and dissertations, and it is also the language researchers use in their articles. It includes the language of the natural sciences and the humanities. Why is it necessary to know the conventions of academic writing? When you write academic papers, you need to signal that you are part of the discourse community — a community of people sharing values and goals, and what is most important, language. Academic language has several features that you should be aware of. Here they are outlined, and further detail is given in later chapters. Academic language is objective, not personal. It means you do not usually express your opinion. If you do, you do it cautiously with supporting evidence and examples. Academic language is more complex than spoken language. It is characterised by longer words and sentences, and more complex structures, for example: Quantitative analysis identifi ed a tendency that students who experienced online collaboration that was better than in-class also tended to feel that they learned more at home, with 52% of those who thought collaboration was better than in class reporting that they learned more at home, while 67% of those who thought the collaboration was less helpful than in class thought they learned less at home. (DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2020.1854337) Formality means the avoidance of words and phrases you are likely to use when speaking informally. You use less frequent but more specifi c words. They allow the author to convey a meaning more precisely.
Table 1 Frequent vocabulary units and their less frequent equivalents A frequent word Less frequent, but more specifi c equivalents to say to announce, to maintain, to report, to state, to voice little insuffi cient, insignifi cant, limited people human beings, the public, community The other features are precision and explicitness. In academic language, facts and numbers are given precisely. In an academic text, you need to explain in detail every step you take in your research. When you are writing in English, you are responsible for making everything clear for the reader. You show that all parts of your text are related and use special linguistic devices to show these connections. Academic writing is clearly organised. Usually when you are writing an academic paper, you know what structure is expected of you and you follow it strictly. In an IMRAD article, each part answers a particular question. The backbone of an article are the research questions. The fl ow of your paper should be seamless and easy to follow. Table 2 The parts of an IMRAD article and the questions they answer Abstract What are the background, the objective, the methods and the results? Introduction What is the context of the research? What are the gaps and contradictions in previous research? What are the research questions? Why?
Table 2 (continued) Methods What did the authors do to answer the research questions? How? Results What were the answers to each question? How can the fi ndings be summarised in tables and fi gures? What? Discussion + Conclusion What is the signifi cance of the results? How does it fi t with other research on the topic? So what? References How can the sources be found? One more important feature of academic writing is that its main aim is to persuade the reader. In different parts of an article, you convince the reader that your research question is important and well-grounded, that the research methods have been chosen correctly, and that the conclusions you make are justifi ed. An important reason for articles being rejected by journals is poor argumentation and logical reasoning. Read the statements about the features of scientifi c argumentation and tick those that are true. You will fi nd the answers at the end of the chapter. 1. Words like ‘very’ ‘extremely’ ‘strongly’ or ‘always’ indicate that you are trying to convince the reader of your position by using emotion rather than argument and evidence. 2. Emotional persuasion is acceptable in scientifi c writing. 3. You should state, not imply, important information. 4. Important information should be placed fi rst or last in a sentence. 5. Less important information should be discussed in depth as well. 6. Special verbal signals are often used to indicate important information. 7. The discussion is guided by the main fi ndings and their implications.
People from different cultures think and write differently. Russians, for example, tend to deviate from the main idea and add unrelated information (Kaplan, 1966). The image below illustrates the alleged thinking patterns of individuals pertaining to different cultures. To be successful in academic writing in English, you need to understand what conventions, or rules you need to follow. The socalled Anglo-Saxon academic writing style is straightforward: you have to develop an idea throughout the paper. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x) Knowing how to structure arguments is essential for successful academic writing. In an argument you make a claim, that is, you state an idea or an assumption and you provide proof for your claim. In some cases, you will outline the objections other people provide and refute them. You may also draw a conclusion summarising your claim and support. The basic unit of academic writing — the paragraph — follows the argument structure. In a paragraph you have a topic sentence that states the claim, supporting sentences that provide proof, evidence, and examples, and, possibly but not obligatorily, a closing sentence, which echoes the claim. This structure resembles a hamburger. Look at the example paragraph. The claim, given in bold in the topic sentence, is that in non-English-speaking countries researchers face diffi culties in publication activity. The proof is underlined: insuffi cient linguistic competence impedes understanding. Note that the evidence presented is referenced.
In non-Anglophone contexts other issues prevent publication activity. In academic environments where English is a non-native language, insuffi cient linguistic competence and unawareness of anglo-american academic conventions are believed to be the dominant issues (Frumina & West, 2012; Gea-Valor, Rey-Rocha, & Moreno, 2014; Min, 2014; Olsson, & Sheridan, 2012). Even researchers from European countries experience diffi culties on the levels of lexis, grammar and rhetoric (Perez-Llantada, Plo, & Ferguson, 2011). Academics are “linguistically constrained in writing their papers in English”, and this is felt as “burdensome” (ibid., p. 206); therefore, scholars “heavily rely on external help to cope with linguistic issues” (Fernandez, & Varela, 2009, p. 159). In humanities and social sciences, linguistic demands may be higher than in hard sciences (Gnutzmann, Rabe, 2014). There is a fear that the incorrect use of English can impede reviewers’ understanding of the main message (Min, 2014), which actually happens at times and leads to rejections. (https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/books/emerging/chapter4.pdf) To summarise, academic writing is diffi cult, even for native speakers, and should be purposefully mastered. It is different from the language we use on an everyday basis. Through academic writing, you engage in a dialogue with your readers without even knowing them. You need to provide clear argumentation and carefully organise your writing. You need to be precise and explicit to convince your reader. This involves not only writing but also thinking. Have I provided suffi cient argumentation to persuade you that you need to get the grasp of academic English? Answers True: 1, 3, 4, 6, 7.