English for Law Students: University Course
Покупка
Тематика:
Английский язык
Издательство:
Статут
Под ред.:
Тарасова Татьяна Ильинична
Год издания: 2016
Кол-во страниц: 672
Дополнительно
Вид издания:
Учебное пособие
Уровень образования:
ВО - Бакалавриат
ISBN: 978-5-8354-1138-2
Артикул: 648935.01.99
ENGLISH FOR LAW STUDENTS is a part of the university course of
legal English for academic purposes. It is addressed to law students of noncommon
law countries. It is aimed at teaching students to understand the
language of Anglo-American legal system, its fundamental concepts and
institutions. Its goal is to enable students to deal with different types of legal
texts, to become knowledgeable in current legal issues, to use proper English
legal terms with regard to their own legal systems. The final objective is to
stimulate students’ interest in law and language. Although English for Law
Students is designed as a part of the university course of legal English it can
also be useful for students of the humanities, economics, social and political
sciences, etc. in their self-study of English law and language.
Тематика:
ББК:
УДК:
ОКСО:
- 40.00.00: ЮРИСПРУДЕНЦИЯ
- 45.00.00: ЯЗЫКОЗНАНИЕ И ЛИТЕРАТУРОВЕДЕНИЕ
- ВО - Бакалавриат
- 45.03.02: Лингвистика
- ВО - Магистратура
- 45.04.02: Лингвистика
Скопировать запись
Фрагмент текстового слоя документа размещен для индексирующих роботов
M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University Law School Department of Foreign Languages ENGLISH FOR LAW STUDENTS UNIVERSITY COURSE Part II Рекомендовано Учебно-методическим объединением по юридическому образованию высших учебных заведений в качестве учебного пособия для студентов высших учебных заведений, обучающихся по направлению «Юриспруденция» и специальности «Юриспруденция» СТАТУТ MOCHBft 2016
УДК 802/809.1 ББК 81.2 Е 58 EDITED BY Tatiana Tarasova CONTRIBUTORS: Natalya Berezhneva, Asya Goloborodko, Dina Karpova, Tatiana Patenkova, Tatiana Tarasova REVIEWED BY Suren Avakjan, Professor of Law, Eugenia Yakovleva, Professor of Linguistics, Anna Lebedeva, Professor of Liguistics Е 58 English for Law Students: University Course / Ed. by T. Tarasova. Part II. — Moscow: STATUT, 2016. — 672 p. [Английский язык для студентов-юристов. — М.: Статут, 2016. — На английском языке] ISBN 978-5-8354-1138-2 (Part II; softback) ISBN 978-5-8354-0977-8 ENGLISH FOR LAW STUDENTS is a part of the university course of legal English for academic purposes. It is addressed to law students of noncommon law countries. It is aimed at teaching students to understand the language of Anglo-American legal system, its fundamental concepts and institutions. Its goal is to enable students to deal with different types of legal texts, to become knowledgeable in current legal issues, to use proper English legal terms with regard to their own legal systems. The final objective is to stimulate students’ interest in law and language. Although English for Law Students is designed as a part of the university course of legal English it can also be useful for students of the humanities, economics, social and political sciences, etc. in their self-study of English law and language. ISBN 978-5-8354-1138-2 (Part II) ISBN 978-5-8354-0977-8 УДК 802/809.1 ББК 81.2 © Contributors, 2015 © Издательство «Статут» (Statut Publishing House), 2015
CONTENTS Foreword ........................................... 6 UNIT I THE HISTORY OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION Text 1. The Need for a New Constitution............. 8 Text 2. The Actual Writers of the Constitution .... 25 Text 3. “We the People of the United States” ...... 42 Text 4. Ratification of the Constitution .......... 58 Text 5. The First National Government under the Constitution ......................... 70 UNIT II AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM: ORIGINS AND PRINCIPLES Text 1. The Origins of American Constitutionalism . 83 Text 2. American Circumstances.................... 107 Text 3. The American Constitutional System: Principal Characteristics ............... 131 UNIT III U.S. CONGRESS Text 1. Historical and Constitutional Background of Legislative Power .................... 152 Text 2. Congress Membership....................... 168 Text 3. Sources of Legislation ................... 181 Text 4. Introduction and Referral to Committees .. 190 Text 5. Senate Action............................. 202 3
CONTENTS Text 6. Congress’s Investigative Oversight Role ..... 215 Text 7. The Enactment Process........................ 225 Text 8. The Party Organization ...................... 231 Text 9. Representative Government ................... 238 UNIT IV U.S. PRESIDENCY Text 1. The Chief Executive.......................... 246 Text 2. The Power of Appointment .................... 257 Text 3. Enumerated, Implied, Inherent Powers......... 268 Text 4. The Treaty-Making Power ..................... 277 Text 5. Executive Agreements......................... 289 Text 6. The Presidential Veto........................ 300 Text 7. The President as Legislator ................. 308 Text 8. Impeachment ................................. 324 Text 9. The Intent of the Framers Versus the Modern American Presidency........... 332 UNIT V THE ORGANIZATION OF COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES Text 1. State Courts v. Federal Courts............... 347 Text 2. The Structure of American Courts .........361 Text 3. Consequences of the Dual Court System........ 379 Text 4. The Administrative Organization of Courts ... 392 UNIT VI THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Text 1. The Court and Constitutional Interpretation . 411 Text 2. The Court as an Institution ................. 428 4
CONTENTS Text 3. Constitutional Guide and Modern Developments ........................................ 448 Text 4. The Court and its Procedures ................ 466 Text 5. A Unique Court............................... 479 Text 6. Judicial Review.............................. 502 Glossary ............................................ 526 Keys ................................................ 652 References ...........................................671
FOREWORD English for Law Students PART II is designed • to meet the students’ needs in acquiring both language through law and law through language; • to strengthen their reading and writing skills; • to develop the students’ ability to analyze, summarize and interpret legal texts concerning particular legal area or issue; • to introduce common law terms, concepts and institutions to the students of a non-common law system; • to increase their competence in legal language usage; • to provide thought provoking materials; • to encourage analytical approach to and comparative studies of current legal issues and reforms; • to equip students with linguistic tools to advance in their scholarly activity. English for Law Students contains six UNITS: The History of the U.S. Constitution, American Constitutionalism: Origins and Principles, U.S. Congress, U.S. Presidency, The Organization of Courts in the United States, The United States Supreme Court. Each unit includes a number of texts on a particular theme followed by LANGUAGE PRACTICE and COMPREHENSION CHECK with TASKS ranging from word building to complicated legal vocabulary, grammar, syntax, discussion points. They focus on reading comprehension, speaking and writing activities. Each unit ends with the task to write an essay based on the texts of the unit which make up one of the exam questions. 6
FOREWORD The KEY at the end of the book gives the answers to some exercises. The GLOSSARY provides definitions for most legal terms used in the units. English for Law Students PART II is designed for all those who strive for academic excellence and professional success.
UNIT I THE HISTORY OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION TEXT 1 THE NEED FOR A NEW CONSTITUTION PRE-READING QUESTION: 1. Was the U.S. Constitution the first one in history? 2. Were there other early Constitutions? 1. For most of modern history the word constitution has meant the entire legal framework of a nation. For example, the English “constitution” includes the Magna Charta of 1215, which was the first written set of restrictions on kingly power, the Petition of Right of 1628, the English Bill of Rights of 1689, the Reform Bills of 1832 and 1867, many statutes, judicial decisions, and royal pronouncements, as well as common law and established government customs and usages. Thus, the English constitution is both much less than and much more than a written constitution such as the American one. In fact, a written constitution - setting forth a plan of government, establishing its institutions, and proclaiming the rights of citizens — is a relatively new development. 2. Although claims have been made for the Mayflower Compact of 1620, the 1630 Charter of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, and the 1639 Fundamental Orders of Connecticut, many scholars agree that the first written constitution of 8
THE HISTORY OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION government was England’s 1653 Instrument of Government. The Instrument, which set out a new, republican form of government, and its 1657 successor, the Humble Petition and Advice, were swept away by the Restoration of Charles II in 1660 and had almost no influence on either English or American constitutional development, but they did presage many later reforms in England. 3. The English colonists in North America regarded themselves as Englishmen possessing all the rights of Englishmen, even though they lived thousands of miles away from the mother country. Each colony had some form of written instrument of government by the eighteenth century, usually a royal charter. Originally, there were three types of colonies: joint-stock companies, organized as economic ventures under a charter granted by the Crown conferring certain privileges, as with trade (for example, Virginia and Massachusetts Bay); compacts, agreements reached by and among the colonists themselves (Plymouth; Providence, R.I.; Fundamental Orders of Connecticut); and proprietary colonies, in which the Crown granted the land composing the colony to one or more landholders known as proprietors. By the mid-eighteenth century, most of the colonies were royal colonies, in which the former joint-stock company or compact form had been replaced by direct royal authority residing in the governor. In Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Delaware, the proprietors (not the Crown) appointed the governors; in Connecticut and Rhode Island, the surviving charter colonies, the colonists themselves chose their governors. Each colony also had a two-house, or bicameral, legislature; the lower house was elected by those colonists who could meet qualifications based on the amount of real or personal property they had, while the upper house was selected by the lower house. The upper house, or council, had both legislative and executive 9
UNIT I powers and duties, in that it also advised the governor on a daily basis. The royal charters that most colonies possessed became the focus of disputes between the colonists and their governments, with the colonials challenging what they saw as arbitrary and unconstitutional exercises of power. 4. The initial stages of the American Revolution were moves and counter-moves in an intricate but fierce struggle to determine the limits of Parliamentary authority. Parliament retained supreme legislative power over the colonies, while at the same time other key agencies, such as the Privy Council, the Secretary of State, the Treasury, the Admiralty, and the Board of Trade, also had responsibility for colonial affairs, with the result that for most of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries British administration of the colonies was entangled in bureaucratic infighting and prey to incompetence and mismanagement. 5. In May of 1776, anticipating its action two months later in the Declaration of Independence, the Second Continental Congress passed a resolution calling upon the colonies to prepare new, written constitutions in case it became necessary for them to separate from England. A few colonies merely modified their old charters, deleting all references to the king and England, but within the next few years most prepared entirely new, republican constitutions. These reflected the Americans’ concern with arbitrary power, particularly arbitrary executive power. Pennsylvania’s constitution of 1776 even did away, with a separate executive, establishing instead a Supreme Executive Council chosen by and under the thumb of its one-house legislature. Other states provided for a weak governor and a powerful two-house legislature. Still others, notably New York in 1777 and Massachusetts in 1780, created an independent governor, who was armed with veto power over legislation (although New York’s constitution granted only a qualified veto 10